|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Ore Bunny
Kuh Schubs Clan
4
   |
Posted - 2012.05.04 23:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: T2BPO's in some lines is not irrelevant. Invention should be more efficient than T2BPO .
And why? because T2 BPOs cost 100 times more than an Invention with similar effort?... I dont get it
Also, could you please link the source if this 84% information, just curious. |
Ore Bunny
Kuh Schubs Clan
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.05 00:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
yea ok, Inties probably compete with faction hulls a lot, but why are you so selective with your examples and ignore that Hulk, Cap.Recharger II or cov ops cloak.
so... 92% of Covert Ops cloaking Device II produced using BPC`S WTF OMG, Boost BPO`s nerf Invention!
thx for the link btw. |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 09:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tadeo Musashy wrote:
it remembers me of king's vanities in Paris's 17th century, or Tzar's attitude in old Rusia's early 1900... or 80-90 years latter Easter Europe - other times, other "Tzars", same attitude, same outcome, ...
Are you serious dude?
not doubting your knowledge, but have you ever brought up a argument that has anything to do with EVE-Online?
|
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 15:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
poor Brewlar ...seriously sad to read  |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 20:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
By significant he means absolutely game breaking for those that do no own said T2BPO. To say the amount of Hulks produced from BPO is ********. It's billions of isk worth each month.
http://eveeye.com/profit.asp?blueprint=Hulk+Blueprint&ML=10&PL=10
~2,5 bn profit for 24/7 manufaction is hardly unfair, significant or game breaking when the BPO is a investment of easy half a trillion (means no matter if the Owner uses the BPO or not, he has still much more cake than you)
bring more such good examples, Cakehater |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 22:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:''Interceptors'' A commonly used and commonly destroyed ship which is dominated by a handful of t2BPO owners. Sweet.
Remove T2BPO let non pet players manufacture interceptors for profit instead of CCP's chosen friends.
WRONG...do your homework better please (or actually do the numbers finally)
even with a BPO you can make negative profit-->
http://eveeye.com/profit.asp?blueprint=Crusader+Blueprint&ML=50&PL=50&P=1&sellPrice=11.048.992,00
or make decent profit with a bpc
http://eveeye.com/profit.asp?blueprint=Crow+Blueprint&ML=-4&PL=-4&P=1
|
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 23:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
WTF are you on? You link two different ships.
Remove T2BPO make EVE real.
no ****, I linked two ships!
2 examples to prove that your theory about interceptors was just wrong. first example that showed you, that even with a T2 BPO you make negative profit (who cares if somebody can uncercut you or not when you lose money by building it), the other that you can make significant profit with inventing them.
god damn, I even have to explain the simplest explanation and you still dont get it. |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 16:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
the fact that invention has lower ME than a T2BPO is moronic
..no its not.
T2 BPOs give you a quite low hard limit on how much you can build with them, so they have to have a better ME to be of any use.
Invention doesnt have a limit on how many items( aka profit) you can make, wich at the end gives invention a much better potencial.
seriously if your not able to get that you should stop posting, its getting ridiculous. |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.22 17:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Yeah Joy, T2BPO undercutting my manufcature and invention cost lucky for me I have the potential to blow billions of ISK away with multiple BPC's in mutliple slots while the T2BPO is stuck making zero effort profit in one slot.
you said that crap 100 times now, and we've proven you 100 times that its just wrong. Even if you would remove all T2 BPO`s not every item can be made with profit. Your looking for a ******-prove game that eve clearly is not supposed to be.
|
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 21:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:Krawdad wrote:
For now, disregarding the specifics I mentioned, do you think the idea could ever be used to achieve a compromise? Do you think limiting the production capabilities of the t2 BPOs is even worth considering?
thats how it is right now, dude...with just ONE invention char you can out-perform any T2 BPO by the pure number that you can build. If you want to read up, Akita actually didput a lot of effort into sheets and did the numbers very carefull with the result that T2 BPO`s are no Problem for Inventions tbh. at the moment its just about beeing bu**hurt and 1-2 desperate haters that simply ignore all facts and numbers and just want them removed JUST to win this argument, justified or not. the other thing is that brewlar keeps saying that most or many BPO`s were gifted to certain players wich would really just be bull** and I think nobody would argue that these players along with their donators should be fined/banned. Allthough, so far we havent seen any proof of that, yet. You cant, Thank you.
so cool, lol
|
|
|
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 01:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Ok...
- I buy a corp with 5.0 faction standing
- I get my research alt in (let's say this character has 2.0 standing with said faction)
- Corp's standing with that faction will drop.
maaate, I think your pedals are going to fast to see it, but it looks like they are going backwards |
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 11:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Who cares if there were more than 2 traders just follow the transaction trail applying negative balances if needs be.
true, but on the other hand who honestly cares about your baby-like moaning?
|
Ore Bunny
Perkone
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 11:28:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Ore Bunny wrote:true, but on the other hand who honestly cares about your baby-like moaning?
Oh nice... More T2 BPO owners.
Hello there!
how do you feel about that now?
|
|
|
| |
|